O
Richardson
← Community
Zoningdeclining community discussion

Proposed Retroactive "Resign-to-Run" Charter Amendment

Richardson

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (6)Concerned (1)

At a glance

Public comments
7
Last 30 days
0
Importance
37

Declining — less community discussion. 0 comments in the last 30 days.

Public comments (7)

OpposedElaine CampbellFeb 2, 2026

Expressed strong opposition to placing a retroactive resign-to-run proposition on the charter ballot, calling it an unfair recall targeting a specific council member.

City Council — City Council · 5:27 →
OpposedGerald PlumFeb 2, 2026

Voiced support for general city ordinances but urged the council to remove any retroactive provisions regarding elections.

City Council — City Council · 9:04 →
OpposedCandice WalterFeb 2, 2026

Strongly opposed retroactive charter amendments, stating they are unfair to candidates and voters.

City Council — City Council · 9:58 →
OpposedJeremy WanamakerFeb 2, 2026

Expressed opposition to retroactive rules while noting he supports future-looking resign-to-run policies.

City Council — City Council · 12:41 →
OpposedMark WickershamFeb 2, 2026

Argued that charter amendments should be forward-looking and that a retroactive rule creates legal risks and acts as an improper recall.

City Council — City Council · 14:07 →
OpposedJames MyersFeb 2, 2026

Expressed strong opposition to retroactive charter propositions, calling them undemocratic and ethically questionable.

City Council — City Council · 23:28 →
ConcernedSherry JonesFeb 2, 2026

Expressed concern that targeting a single council member retroactively feels retaliatory and damages community trust.

City Council — City Council · 26:23 →